男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

The Historical Process of Township Reform

2016-01-07

By Zhao Shukai, Development Research Center

By examining the goals and process of county and township reform in the past 20 years and more, we may find that practical evolvement of reform tend to go beyond the initial good wishes for policy design and get landed in a weak position. In a sense, this plight can be summed up as a simple system cycle that when the government deregulates its control, it would result in disorder and the government would exercise macro-control whereas its ability is impotent and incomplete. However, the problems are far more complicated and profound than this description. First, reform goals were clear previously. The establishment of household land contract responsibility system unveiled the economic reform in rural areas. Reform was launched after township governments’ work return to normal. To strengthen and improve the rural community-level regime building was considered as “a crucial component in China’s political system reform”, which proposed systematically to solve township problems and improve township regime building in both aspects of politics and economy and at three levels of villages, townships and counties. Second, the reform process went through twists and turns. Since the CPC Central Committee and the State Council released the Notice on Strengthening Rural Community-level Political Power Building in 1986 and made overall arrangements for community-level political power reform, townships have made efforts in reforming the institutional layout, division of power and the governance structure. Such trial practice has made some progress, but up till now, the initial basic reform goals are yet to be achieved. Third, the problem is in which way government reform should follow. The current county and township reform is placed under a social and historical environment of comprehensive rural reform. The significance of government reform is gaining increasing recognition in society. Government reform has passed the township level to enter the core of the government system. How to understand problems in the entire government system through resolving community-level government problems and how to examine China’s government innovation by reviewing evolvement of community-level government are questions worth special attention in the current stage of government reform research.

 
For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 

 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 德保县| 靖安县| 桓台县| 平乐县| 凤庆县| 河北省| 苏尼特右旗| 汾阳市| 建平县| 长汀县| 徐水县| 胶州市| 廉江市| 修文县| 喀喇| 甘泉县| 海城市| 高平市| 巴彦县| 莱阳市| 西贡区| 固始县| 右玉县| 榕江县| 玉门市| 海兴县| 都兰县| 万盛区| 金阳县| 六枝特区| 彭山县| 岗巴县| 陆川县| 苍山县| 虎林市| 河北省| 恩施市| 井冈山市| 固原市| 汉阴县| 都安|