男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Fintech firms must comply with financial rules

China Daily | Updated: 2020-11-06 07:11
Share
Share - WeChat
A mascot of Ant Group at the company's headquarters in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province. [Photo by Long Wei/for China Daily]

Thanks to the financial sector's rapid development in recent years, its added value to China's GDP has surpassed that of the United States in 2013 and United Kingdom in 2015.

Expectedly, the relevant regulatory departments have been pushing the financial sector to "transfer profits" to the real economy, resulting in a gradual decline of its added value to GDP since 2016.

In the early years, it was believed that internet finance was "subverting banks" and producing a "catfish effect" in promoting technological transformation of the traditional financial sector. However, the banking sector is still functioning, while internet finance has encountered challenges.

Under the pressure of regulatory compliance, fintech companies have actively embraced the colossal traditional financial market, which has helped the financial sector in serving the real economy while also distorting the process.
Against the backdrop of the excessive growth of the fintech lending business, some small and medium-sized banks have deviated from their obligation to serve the real economy, and issued a large amount of personal consumption loans to customers lacking sufficient solvency.

At the same time, fintech companies have grown rapidly, with some almost dominating the market. As a result, some of the financial sector's profits have been transferred to technology companies, while the cost for real enterprises' financing has not been really lowered.

It is true that an inclusive approach should be adopted when authorities regulate fintech innovation, but that does not mean unprincipled connivance.
Given the many problems that have emerged in the process of fintech innovations, the regulatory authorities must not sit idle. They should instead intervene in a timely manner. Fintech companies must not be allowed to evade financial regulation.

Since that fintech has broken the clear boundaries for financial business, the effective regulation over the fintech sector should not depend on financial regulatory authorities alone, because it is difficult for the financial authorities to carry out effective supervision over nonfinancial entities. In this aspect, the rectification of internet finance by the authorities in recent years can provide reference for multi-departmental cooperation in the supervision over the fintech sector.

Given that fintech is increasingly driven by data, China should promote the construction of a data information sharing mechanism for leading fintech enterprises. At the same time, the authorities should be wary of the "winner-takes-all" phenomenon in the fintech sector to prevent the "over-puffiness" of few fintech companies.

-21st Century Business Herald

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 海原县| 新沂市| 松溪县| 昌平区| 广河县| 双桥区| 贡山| 宣城市| 读书| 石城县| 泾川县| 瓦房店市| 信宜市| 阳原县| 泗阳县| 巴南区| 衡东县| 大渡口区| 洛隆县| 达日县| 三河市| 扎兰屯市| 泗水县| 霍林郭勒市| 安达市| 阿城市| 旌德县| 馆陶县| 赤城县| 会泽县| 雷波县| 年辖:市辖区| 昌邑市| 宜都市| 信阳市| 南川市| 汤阴县| 明光市| 苏尼特右旗| 肥城市| 松桃|