男友太凶猛1v1高h,大地资源在线资源免费观看 ,人妻少妇精品视频二区,极度sm残忍bdsm变态

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Administrative changes must be publicized

China Daily | Updated: 2017-04-18 07:37
Share
Share - WeChat

Administrative service center of Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area

A MAN RUNNING A CONTACT LENS BUSINESS in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong province, reportedly spent four days making dozens of phone calls and paying visits to several offices, trying to submit the needed documents to the local food and drug bureau. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Monday:

The man was told to prepare a variety of documents and certificates and take them to the local "drug safety bureau", which, however, was nowhere to be found.

It took him four days during which he sought assistance from a number of public hotlines and even the Shenzhen police, before he finally found out that the drug safety bureau had been integrated into the local food and drug administration three years ago. The new administration, as part of Shenzhen's latest efforts to streamline its administration and enhance work efficiency, has been placed under direct administration of the city's market and quality supervision commission.

Apparently, the man was not aware of these confusing administrative alterations nor was he informed of the changes in advance. His four-day struggle came to an end as he decided to send his documents via express service to the sought-after food and drug administration.

The businessman has good reason to rush to submit his qualifications and hope for timely authorization, because if it was not deemed qualified, his contact lens business could face a fine of more than 50,000 yuan ($7,300). But his search for the food and drug authorities did not go well and no one was there to guide him through the maze of newly established and regrouped departments.

Long hailed as a successful test-bed for administrative reform and efficient governance, Shenzhen may well reflect over what happened to this business owner. Getting rid of redundant administrative bodies is a justifiable move, but people's legitimate right to know about any administrative changes must be respected. The pursuit of efficiency from the top down is questionable if that is not the effect for the end user.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 潼南县| 丰顺县| 仪陇县| 四平市| 福鼎市| 通山县| 武隆县| 大方县| 河北省| 乌鲁木齐县| 汉源县| 定西市| 社会| 嫩江县| 邹平县| 浮山县| 盐亭县| 盐池县| 旬邑县| 中卫市| 旺苍县| 连云港市| 桓台县| 义乌市| 阿尔山市| 成安县| 平安县| 马关县| 宜州市| 齐河县| 乌兰察布市| 开封县| 五家渠市| 丘北县| 金寨县| 车致| 曲阜市| 临清市| 屏东市| 资兴市| 卢湾区|